Discrepancies have emerged regarding the software of sulfur secure isotope ratios as a biosignature in impression crater paleolakes.
The primary in situ δ34S knowledge from Mars at Gale crater show a ∼75‰ vary that has been attributed to an abiotic mechanism. But biogeochemical research of historic environments on Earth typically interpret δ34S fractionations >21‰ as indicative of a organic origin, and research of δ34S at analog impression crater lakes on Earth have adopted the identical strategy.
We carried out analyses (together with δ34S, complete natural carbon wt%, and scanning electron microscope imaging) on a number of lithologies from the Nördlinger Ries impression crater, specializing in hydrothermally altered impression breccias and related sedimentary lake-fill sequences to find out whether or not the δ34S properties outline a biosignature.
The variations in δ34S between the host lithologies might have resulted from thermochemical sulfate discount, microbial sulfate discount, hydrothermal equilibrium fractionation, or any mixture thereof. Regardless of plentiful samples and instrumental precision at present unique to Earth-bound analyses, assertions of biogenicity from δ34S variations >21‰ on the Miocene Ries impression crater are tenuous.
This discourages using δ34S as a biosignature in related environments with out impartial checks that embrace the total geologic, biogeochemical, and textural context, in addition to a complete acknowledgment of other hypotheses.
Christopher J Tino, Eva E Stüeken, Gernot Arp , Michael Ernst Böttcher, Steven M Bates, Timothy W Lyons
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37498995/
PMID: 37498995 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2022.0114
Astrobiology