Landing on the Moon Vs landing on Mars

ISRO will face its greatest take a look at on August 23, when the Vikram lander of the Chandrayaan-3 mission makes its descent for a comfortable touchdown on the Moon’s South Pole. The lander is at present orbiting the Moon in a 25 km X 134 km orbit after finishing the second deboosting maneuver on August 20. Notably, the Chandrayaan-2 mission, launched in 2019, additionally cleared these tense phases however crashed on the Moon after dropping contact with floor stations.

(Chandrayaan-3 Vikram lander; Picture: ISRO)

This time round, ISRO is assured that the touchdown might be profitable, nonetheless, the current missions which the Moon has killed do elevate some doubts. For a number of many years, people have been touchdown probes on Moon and our second most well-liked vacation spot – Mars. The primary success got here in 1969 when NASA landed two astronauts on the lunar floor adopted by Mars 3, the lander which made the primary landing on the pink planet in 1971.

The successes have been coupled with many failed makes an attempt on each worlds, one thing which explains how sophisticated area actually is. However, which one is tougher to tame, the Moon or Mars’

Which one’s simpler to land on?

None. Each the Moon and Mars pose their very own challenges which may very well be associated to distance from Earth or its environment. Whereas NASA has efficiently tried touchdown close to the Moon’s equatorial areas, no nation has ever dared to land on the South Pole of the Moon till now.

Aside from Chandrayaan-3, Japan’s non-public agency ispace and Russian area company Roscosmos despatched their landers to the South Pole however did not land. However what are the challenges that the Moon poses’ Properly, to start with, the Moon has an especially skinny environment referred to as the exosphere, which is nothing in comparison with the Earth’s. This eliminates using parachutes to make sure a secure touchdown on the floor. The mission controllers need to solely depend on the lander’s engines and use the correct amount of thrust to steer it over the Moon.

Russia’s Luna-25 mission ended on August 20 on account of a malfunction within the engine of the lander because it operated for 127 seconds as a substitute of 84 seconds and despatched it spinning uncontrolled earlier than a crash.

(The Luna-25 lander; Picture: NPO Lavochkina/Roscosmos

One other main problem is figuring out the right touchdown website for a probe. Like Earth, the Moon doesn’t have navigation methods that would assist in pinpointing secure places for a landing. Retaining communications intact all through all the touchdown sequence is one other main hurdle, one thing which swallowed Chandrayaan-2 and ispace’s HAKUTO-R touchdown missions.

Chandrayaan-2, which was launched on July 22, 2019, misplaced communication with the mission staff when it was simply a few km above the lunar floor and made a tough touchdown. Israel’s Beresheet mission, the primary from the nation, additionally resulted in a failure after its launch on February 22, 2019, throughout the touchdown try because the communication was misplaced. The HAKUTO-R mission met the identical ending on April 25 after the lander miscalculated the altitude and spent all its gas in orbit.

(Artist’s illustration of the HAKUTO lander. Picture: ispace)

Some would possibly even query if people truly landed on the Moon throughout the Apollo program contemplating the difficulties in acing a secure landing at this time. What’s value noting, nonetheless, is that the lads who flew to the Moon piloted the touchdown module. Presently, all that scientists can do is feed directions into the robotic landers and management it from a distance of about 4 lakh km. In accordance with a 2019 knowledge from NASA, solely 60 per cent of the Moon missions have been profitable within the final six many years. Out of the entire (109), 61 have been profitable and 48 failed.

Touchdown on Mars may very well be equally terrifying as elements corresponding to sign loss and atmospheric density may jeopardise the mission. One such instance of a failed mission on Mars is the Soviet Union’s Mars 2 which launched in 1970. It’s remembered as the primary man-made object to the touch down on Mars though unsuccessfully. The mission failed after the lander crashed throughout an enormous mud storm.

The subsequent mission, Mars 3, went a step forward and landed efficiently on Mars on December 2, 1971, a yr after its launch. This mission additionally failed after contact was misplaced with the lander simply 20 seconds after it began taking footage of the planet’s terrain.

The Earth and Mars are separated by a distance of 400 million km which causes delay in indicators forwards and backwards between the planets. In accordance with the European Area Company (ESA), the sign delay was 13 minutes, 48 seconds throughout the Entry, Descent and Touchdown (EDL) of the Curiosity rover.

Mars, nonetheless, offers on benefit over the Moon. Though its environment is a 100 occasions thinner than that of Earth, enormous parachutes can be utilized to decelerate the lander. NASA’s Viking landers and Curiosity and Perseverance rovers have efficiently landed on Mars utilizing enormous parachutes. All in all, area is unforgiving and even the slightest error can ship years of hardwork and tens of millions of {dollars} down the drain. Nonetheless, main area companies nonetheless have various missions deliberate to the Moon and Mars as they search to make people a multiplanetary species.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *